Enlarged Curvature, Torsion and Torque in Helical Conformations and the Stability and Growth of α-Peptide under the Isochoric and Isobaric Conditions: Variatonal Optimization
Main Article Content
Abstract
The torsional deformation behavior of an elastic bar with a circular cross-section was investigated by applying invariant dyadic analysis, where the small finite displacement functions advocated by Saint-Venant (1855) were fully employed. It was found that the previously overlooked circumferential shear force field generated by pure torsion on the side walls of a bar produces an unusual torque term induced by the skew-symmetric part of the deformation tensor and exhibits quadratic length dependence along the z-axis of the bar. The adaptation of this torque term for a helical conformation of α-peptides creates moments acting on the circular cross-sections and is directed along the surface normal of circular cross-sections, which coincides with the tangent vector of the helix. The projection of this torque along the z-axis of the helix varies quadratically with the azimuthal angle. The radial component of the unusual torque, which also lies along the principal normal vector of the helix, starts to perform a precession motion by tracking a spiral orbit around the z-axis, whereas its apex angle decreases asymptotically with the azimuthal angle and finally reaches a finite value depending on the height of the helix along the z-axis. The ordinary torque terms, which are also deduced from the self- and anti-self-conjugate parts of the deformation tensor, have magnitudes half that of the full torque term reported in the literature. The present results were applied to the helical conformation of α-peptides designated by {3.611} to show that the mechanical stability of strained open-ended helical conformations can be successfully achieved by spontaneous readjustments of the surface and bulk Helmholtz free energies under isothermal isochoric conditions. It has been demonstrated that the main contribution to the mechanical stability of α-peptide 3.611 cannot come alone from the electrostatic dipole-dipole interaction potential of the anti-align excess dipole pairs but also from the surface Helmholtz free energy, which is characterized by a binding free energy of -15.5 eV/molecule (-32.56 Kcal/mole) for an alpha-peptide composed of 11 amino acid residues with a critical arc length of approximately 10 nm, assuming that the shear modulus is G = 1GPa and the surface Helmholtz specific free energy density is fs = 800 erg/cm2. This result was in excellent agreement with the experimental observations of the AH-1 conformation of (Glu)n Cys at pH 8. The present theory indicates that only two excess permanent anti-align dipole pairs for one α-Helical peptide molecule is requirement to stabilize the whole secondary structure of the protein that is exposed to heavy torsional deformation during the folding processes which amounts to 7.75 eV/molecule stored electrostatic energy compared to the interfacial Helmholtz free energy of -23.25 eV/molecule, which is exposed to hydrophobic
Article Details
Copyright (c) 2024 Ogurtani TO.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
RW, Light. Pleural Diseases, 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins. 2013; 524. Available from: https://books.google.co.in/books/about/Pleural_Diseases.html?id=yyhhma5YZykC&redir_esc=y
Thomsen L, Natho O, Feigen U, Schulz U, Kivelitz D. Value of digital radiography in expiration in detection of pneumothorax. Rofo. 2014 Mar;186(3):267-73. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24043613/
Kollef MH. Risk factors for the misdiagnosis of pneumothorax in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 1991 Jul;19(7):906-10. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2055079/
Howard P, Martin Q. AI applications in emergency radiology. Emerg Radiol. 2022;30(8):678-689.
Doe J, Smith A. Advances in pneumothorax detection using deep learning. J Med Imaging. 2022;45(3):123-134.
Brown D, White E. The role of AI in medical diagnostics. Med Imaging Res. 2021;27(4):345-359.
Johnson S, Young T. AI-based triage systems in healthcare. J Healthc Inform. 2023;35(2):145-159.
Patel D, Shah E. Real-time AI diagnostics in emergency settings. J Emerg Med. 2021;35(6):678-690.
Richards K, Stevens L. AI in radiology: Trends and predictions. J Healthc Technol. 2023;48(2):123-135.
York Z, Zane A. Comparative performance of AI models. J Comput Diagn. 2022;37(3):678-689.
Clark F, Wilson G. Implementing AI in radiology practices. Radiol Today. 2023;31(6):123-137.
King R, Thompson U. Machine learning models for chest x-ray analysis. J Thorac Imaging. 2021;30(3):234-248.
Scott M, Turner N. AI-driven quality improvement in radiology. J Qual Manag. 2021;27(4):356-370.
Foster L, Miller M. Challenges in deep learning for medical imaging. J Comput Biol. 2022;39(7):789-802.
Russakovsky O, Deng J, Su H, Krause J, Satheesh S, Ma S, et al. ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge. Int J Comput Vis. 2015;115(3):211-252. Available from: https://collaborate.princeton.edu/en/publications/imagenet-large-scale-visual-recognition-challenge
Soffer S, Ben-Cohen A, Shimon O, Amitai MM, Greenspan H, Klang E. Convolutional Neural Networks for Radiologic Images: A Radiologist's Guide. Radiology. 2019 Mar;290(3):590-606. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30694159/
Taylor P, Underwood Q. AI in detecting thoracic diseases. J Thorac Dis. 2022;33(5):567-580.
Anderson B, Harris C. Radiology AI: Advances and Challenges. J Radiol Sci. 2022;52(2):89-99.
Vincent T, Williams U. Radiology AI: Ethical considerations. J Med Ethics. 2022;39(4):456-467.
Johnson R, Lee C. Comparative study of AI models in radiology. Radiology AI. 2022;30(4):456-467.
Patel R, Desai M. U-Net architecture for segmentation tasks. Med Image Anal. 2023;25(4):345-356.
Oliver J, Palmer B. Advanced AI techniques in radiology. J Radiol Technol. 2022;26(2):110-122.
Quinn F, Rogers G. The future of AI in medical imaging. Fut Healthc J. 2022;19(1):34-46.
Wang X, Zhang Y. Multi-view learning for medical image analysis. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2023;42(5):789-800.
Kumar S. Transfer learning in medical imaging. J Artif Intell Med. 2022;32(2):234-245.
Unger R, Voss S. AI in radiology education. J Med Educ. 2023;40(3):234-245.
Andrews P, Bennett D. AI in detecting lung diseases. J Pulm Med. 2021;28(4):456-469.
Blumenfeld A, Konen E, Greenspan H. Pneumothorax detection in chest radiographs using convolutional neural networks. In: Medical Imaging: Computer-Aided Diagnosis. 2018;10575:1057504. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2292540.
Taylor AG, Mielke C, Mongan J. Automated detection of moderate and large pneumothorax on frontal chest X-rays using deep convolutional neural networks: A Research Article. PLoS Med. 2018 Nov 20;15(11):e1002697. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30457991/
Davis H, Moore J. AI-driven image segmentation in radiology. J Digit Imaging. 2022;44(5):456-470.
Evans I, Taylor K. Comparative study of segmentation techniques. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2021;24(3):234-246.
Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton GE. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Lake Tahoe, Nevada: Curran Associates Inc.; 2012; 1:2999257. Available from: https://papers.nips.cc/paper_files/paper/2012/hash/c399862d3b9d6b76c8436e924a68c45b-Abstract.html
Walker Y, Xavier W. AI in pediatric radiology. Pediatr Radiol. 2021;18(2):123-136.
Green N, Adams O. Enhancing diagnostic accuracy with AI. J Med Syst. 2023;49(1):12-25.
Lewis V, Parker W. Evaluating AI performance in medical imaging. J Diagn Imaging. 2022;47(6):567-579.
Nash Z, Roberts A. AI and radiologist collaboration. Radiology AI. 2023;32(4):490-503.
Garcia M. External validation of AI models. Int J Med Inform. 2022;60(8):678-690.
Morgan X, Knight Y. The impact of AI on radiology workflows. J Radiol Manage. 2021;22(5):345-356.
Zhang C, Zhou B. AI in imaging: Current trends. J Med Imaging Health Inform. 2023;23(5):567-580.
Liu Q. Semi-supervised learning in healthcare. J Biomed Inform. 2021;29(3):567-579.